Who is ready to lead? I dunno, who has done an absolutely horrible job thus far managing their campaign? If she wants to lead, she can start with her campaign staff, and then work on the entire Federal government.

We are a nation at war and with economic challenges, and we need a president who is past their personal life challenges and is motivated by the challenges we face as a country.

Were you satisfied with Obama’s answer? Has he passed the test, or does he need a little more experience to know what real tests are for an American president?

Both Clinton and Obama gave non-answers, because neither was honest enough to discuss his or her own greatest moment of crisis. Obama’s greatest moment of crisis would probably have been when his biggest benefactor was indicted. Hillary’s greatest moment of crisis was either when she failed the DC bar exam or when the philandering she’d long accepted from her husband became a matter of public knowledge.

If we want a candidate who’s been tested and proven in crisis, may I respectfully suggest John McCain?

You are right, I am ribbing you, because this is ridiculous spinning. I thought both answers were fine…although I do get tired of her saying stuff like, “people ask me, how do you do it?” As if her life is just soooo gosh darn difficult but she pushes on for the good of the American people. It might’ve been a good answer coming from some people, but its hard to buy from Hillary Clinton.

The idea that Obama’s campaign has been all about him, whereas Hillary has been working tirelessly for other people, is sort of ridiculous given the entire bent of the past year…but if it makes you feel better to think Hillary is just some sort of vessel for the American people, go for it.

Hillary Clinton didn’t indicate she’d revert to her own personal problems in a time of crisis, and she put Americans hereos first in her mind. That’s the kind of president I and a majority of Tennesseans hope to see in the White House.

You make absolutely no sense.

The “same kind of people that use it as an excuse to avoid responsibility for bad decisions.” Who the hell voted for the Iraq war and refuses to apologize for that vote?

Why are those soldiers giving life and limb for their country? Because she and her friends gave the President a blank check to go to war.

This idea that Hillary is going to do everything for the Americans, and nothing for herself, is just ludicrous. If you want to argue that her response was better, fine; but to assume from that Obama will be self-obsessed compared to Hillary’s selflessness is just ludicrous and does not at all jibe with her life story and the thrust of her campaign so far.

He answered the question honestly, she gave an applause line; I congratulate her on that…but don’t infer too much from it.

It sounds as if you believe Congress, under a President Obama, should tie his hands. Hillary is positioned to demand that trust from Congress. Obama is positioned to have Republicans waterboard him until he telegraphs his ever move to the enemy.

Hillary voted against an amendment which would’ve required Bush to come back to the Senate before launching an invasion. YES, if you are arguing that Hillary did not vote for a declaration of war, than I would argue they should “tie his hands” if that means that he must have an explicit declaration of war before launching an invasion.

If the resolution which she voted for was not an authorization to go to war, than this occupation is illegal.

Can’t we just say you’re both right?